16:00:33 From Graham Edwards to Lou Wheatcraft, RWG Chair (direct message): Is there any written guidelines/best-practice training documentation available on the use of AI Requirement Development? 16:01:13 From Andrew Pletta to Everyone: Correct: ChatGPT does not know when and how to prefer rvalues over lvalues in modern C++ 16:05:15 From Akshay Chalana to Everyone: Just kicking off now! 16:07:58 From Lou Wheatcraft, RWG Chair to Graham Edwards (direct message): The videos, slides, and chat will be posted on the INCOSE RWG internal iNet site available to INCOSE members. The video will also be put on the INCOSE RWG YouTube channel available to all. 16:08:30 From Lou Wheatcraft, RWG Chair to Everyone: The videos, slides, and chat will be posted on the INCOSE RWG internal iNet site available to INCOSE members. The video will also be put on the INCOSE RWG YouTube channel available to all. 16:18:37 From Andrew Pletta to Everyone: Are you involved in aviation safety compliance? 16:19:33 From Lou Wheatcraft, RWG Chair to Everyone: Are hardware standards and compliance requirements more the focus currently than software standards and compliance? 16:23:07 From Andrew Pletta to Everyone: That's a lot of proprietary information. 16:24:42 From Lou Wheatcraft, RWG Chair to Everyone: Today’s systems are more and more software intensive with software embedded in hybrid hardware software systems, thus safety (and security and resilience) must be addressed holistically focusing on the integrated system behavior and emerging properties. Sadly, standards and regulations seem to still put hardware and software in silos and don’t address the system from a holistic perspective. 16:33:03 From Andrew Pletta to Everyone: "Component" means a physical object, device, or system? 16:35:08 From Lou Wheatcraft, RWG Chair to Everyone: Can we think of a component as a system element which can be either hardware or software? 16:35:30 From Andrew Pletta to Everyone: for example a software component might be a binary that runs on some hardware platform 16:41:18 From Andrew Pletta to Everyone: But 100% knowledge at this stage might be an unsafe assumption. Does your tool allow updating later upon new knowledge? 16:46:50 From Andrew Pletta to Everyone: Hmmm... a healthy child running (for whatever reason) towards the front of my oncoming truck would dramatically reduce the "safe stopping distance". 16:50:37 From Lou Wheatcraft, RWG Chair to Everyone: other factors like breaking force, time of application of that force, tire size and characteristics, road surface, changes due to environmental factors, black ice…….. 17:04:42 From Lou Wheatcraft, RWG Chair to Everyone: Standards and regulations have requirements on the organizations developing a product as well as requirements on the product itself. How do you differentiate and handle these different types of requirements? 17:05:03 From Lou Wheatcraft, RWG Chair to Everyone: There are a lot of considerations when addressing compliance with standards and regulations. The RWG video on standards and regulations compliance can be view on the INCOSE RWG YouTub channel. https://youtu.be/LQmLt4eL_JA 17:06:00 From Lou Wheatcraft, RWG Chair to Everyone: Complying with safety and security standards will not result in a system that is safe or secure. For more details view this video: https://youtu.be/u7NpMY3v4CA 17:07:20 From Andrew Pletta to Everyone: Is this kind of requirements analysis intended to be iterated over the projected device/system lifecycle? AI tools are continually evolving, and an assessment that appears "complete" today might be viewed later as incomplete. 17:07:50 From Graham Edwards to Everyone: Is there a way to limit how many layers of referenced documents are considered? For example, a requirement (from Document A) calls out adherence to Document B. Document B calls out adherence to Document C, etc, etc. 17:08:12 From Esteban Solorzano to Everyone: I am also aware that the FDA would use AI tools. I believe they should provide a guidance document on how they will use AI to perform evaluations. It's still early to know what is their approach. 17:08:34 From Rich Sena to Everyone: so this really looks at constraints and contrasts against the defined requirements to identify weaknesses in the requirement set and defines a get-well set of reqs 17:09:14 From Ikue Warren to Everyone: I saw some check boxes for the standards. Could you please provide a complete list of the standards this system can currently cover? 17:10:49 From Victor Poulsen to Everyone: how does it read standards? are the relevant standards processed and preloaded into the software by you, or can it take standards from users and use them? 17:11:40 From Lou Wheatcraft, RWG Chair to Everyone: Replying to "how does it read standards? are the relevant stand...": Great point. there are both internal and external standards that developers must show compliance. 17:12:47 From Lou Wheatcraft, RWG Chair to Everyone: Replying to "how does it read standards? are the relevant stand...": In some cases the internal standards are an organization’s tailoring of an external standard for the organization’s specific product line. 17:15:17 From Esteban Solorzano to Everyone: Replying to "how does it read standards? are the relevant stand...": IEC 62304 ; would be nice support on this one. 17:15:28 From Catherine Conroy to Everyone: Can it account for order of precedence when there are sections of applicable documents that are superceded by others such as contract specifications? 17:18:41 From Lou Wheatcraft, RWG Chair to Everyone: Replying to "Is there a way to limit how many layers of referen...": Given you requirement is first tier and references a second tier standard that, in turn, references a third tier standard, that references a fourth tier, standard. The organization can make a policy that only second tier standards are applicable. If a third tier standard is applicable, it should be called out by its own requirement making it a second tier standard. 17:24:54 From Prabhu Ambatipudi to Everyone: Need to drop. Thanks Akshay for the informative and thought-provoking presentation! 17:31:17 From Akshay Chalana to Everyone: https://www.youtube.com/@AkshayChalana 17:31:41 From cary bryczek to Everyone: Excellent thanks!! 17:31:54 From Akshay Chalana to Everyone: https://www.youtube.com/@Saphira-AI 17:32:10 From Gaspare Boscarino to Everyone: Thank you. Excellent presentation. 17:32:19 From Ikue Warren to Everyone: Thank you very much! 17:32:21 From Paul Dickinson to Everyone: Fascinating and clearly rapidly developing. Thanks. 17:32:22 From Catherine Conroy to Everyone: Thank you 17:32:34 From Hamish Currie to Everyone: thanks very much