Call for Speakers

If you would like to be a presenter at one of our chapter meetings, please send your proposed topic to the Vice President of Technical Development at ntxinfo@incose.net

Past Presentations from North Texas Chapter Monthly Meetings

Chapter Meeting Dec 13, 2022 

INCOSE RWG 2022 year in review by Mr. Lou Wheatcraft

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: The INCOSE Requirements Working Group is one of the largest and most active of the INCOSE WGs.   This presentation will cover the activities we have been involved during 2022 and our accomplishments.  Our major accomplishments involved monthly RWG Exchange Cafes’ on various topics, release of our major products, and collaboration with other working groups.  This presentation will give an overview of these accomplishments for 2022 and outline our plans for FY2023.

Bio: Lou Wheatcraft is a senior consultant and managing member of Wheatland Consulting, LLC. Lou is an internationally recognized expert in systems engineering with a focus on needs, requirements definition and management and verification and validation across the system lifecycle. Lou has over 50 years’ experience in systems engineering, including 22 years in the United States Air Force. Lou has taught over 200 requirement seminars over the last 22 years. Lou supports clients from government and industries involved in developing and managing systems and products including aerospace, defense, medical devices, consumer goods, transportation, and energy. Lou is very active in the International Council of Systems Engineering (INCOSE) and is a past chair and current co-chair of the Requirements Working Group (RWG).  Lou is a principal author of several RWG manuals and guides.  Lou has spoken at Project Management Institute (PMI) chapter meetings and INCOSE conferences and chapter meetings. Lou has published and presented many papers concerning needs and requirements development and management for NASA’s PM Challenge, INCOSE, INCOSE INSIGHT Magazine, and Crosstalk Magazine. Lou has a BS degree in Electrical Engineering from Oklahoma State University; an MA degree in Computer Information Systems from the University of Houston – Clear Lake; an MS degree in Environmental Management from the University of Houston – Clear Lake; and has completed the course work for an MS degree in Studies of the Future from the University of Houston – Clear Lake.

Chapter Meeting Nov 8, 2022 

“(Don’t) Tell Me What To Do: A Half-Baked Discussion on Process Standardization in the Age of Digital Transformation” by Mr. Kennie Garlington

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: It is difficult to imagine any large project or organization that can be successful without standards related to how they conduct their business or mission. However, there may a number of questions that complicate how we should approach this standardization effort, including:

• What should be standardized?
• What might we gain or lose from standardization?
• Do we ever need to revisit standardization decisions? If so, when and how?

This briefing likely won’t answer these questions, but it might help grow a conversation on the subject.

Bio: Kennie Garlington is a Systems Engineer supporting the Engineering and Technology directorate at Lockheed Martin Aeronautics. In this role, he is responsible for providing systems engineering guidance and technical expertise to all lines of business and programs across the enterprise. Mr. Garlington’s current areas of interest include model-based systems engineering, software safety and reliability, and the application of Agile principles and practices to large-scale mission-critical systems. Mr. Garlington has over 38 years of experience in software engineering and systems engineering for military aircraft programs.

Mr. Garlington’s previous role was the lead systems engineer for various avionics modernization projects for the F-22 Raptor. He has also held systems engineering and software engineering positions on the F-35, F-16 and F-111 platforms. 

Mr. Garlington has a Master of Science in Systems Engineering, as well as a Master’s of Software Engineering and a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science. In addition, he is certified as a SAFe^® Program Consultant (SPC),  a Program Management Institute Agile Certified Professional (PMI-ACP)^®, and an International Council of Systems Engineering (INCOSE) Certified Systems Engineering Professional (CSEP) 

Chapter Meeting Oct 11, 2022 

Patterns and Reporting Models in CATIA Magic (Cameo) Mr. Daniel Brookshier

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: One of the most complex parts of MBSE is creating reports. Transforming model data to a Word document is complex and challenging. We will discuss several patterns to simplify report templates in the CATIA Magic tools to report SysML, UAF, and other models 

Bio: has 40 years of experience in software, modeling, and engineering. He is currently serving on the Architecture Board of the OMG and as a senior solutions Architect at Dassault Systèmes and former Distinguished Engineering Fellow at No Magic

Chapter Meeting Sep 13, 2022 

Case Study: The McAllister Freeway in San Antonio Mr. Paul White

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: Our world is increasing in complexity. How has that complexity affected your programs and projects? In INCOSE’s Vision 2035, we read that we, as systems engineers, must “architect balanced solutions that satisfy diverse stakeholder needs for capability, dependability, sustainability, social acceptability, and ease of use.” In addition, we must “adapt to evolving technology and requirements” and must “manage complexity and risk” in order to have successful programs and projects. 

• City planners 

• San Antonio International Airport 

• Historical societies 

• Environmental groups 

• Federal, state, and local governments 

• Local businesses 

• Landowners 

Bio: Paul White has 23 years of experience in the aerospace industry. He has leadership and technical experience on many aerospace platforms, including 

• Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) MinuteMan-III & Sentinel (GBSD) 

• A-10C 

• OC-135 

• Airbus A400M 

• Integrated Broadcast Service (IBS) 

• Big Safari: Rivet Joint, Combat Sent, and Cobra Ball 

• Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) 

Chapter Meeting Aug 9, 2022 

Model Based Systems Engineering in Space-Based applications by Mr. Andrew Grabowski

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: Satellite design is inherently a very complex process. Model Based Systems Engineering, along with Model Based Design helps manage the complexity and brings quantitative rigor to the field of Systems Engineering. Since its inception, Model-Based Systems Engineering, utilizing MathWorks’ tools, has played an important role in supporting requirements engineering, system architecting, and system integration. 

• Create and manage system requirements 

• Develop architectural diagrams that can be linked to requirements 

• Use Simulation to Verify Linked requirements with Requirements-based Tests 

• Perform System of System analyses and visualizations 

• What is Systems Engineering? 

• What is Model-Based Systems Engineering?

Bio: Andrew Grabowski graduated from UCLA with a Bachelor’s degree in Aerospace Engineering and a concentration in Computer Science, where he researched the utilization of nano-materials for drag reduction in aquatic environments. 

Chapter Meeting July 12, 2022 

Industrial DevOps Principles for Cyber-Physical Solutions by Dr. Suzette Johnson and Ms. Robin Yeman

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: Agile and DevOps practices continue to challenge the status quo and improve mission and business outcomes. Over the years we have seen how these practices have worked well in software and now we are learning how to scale these principles and practices across large, complex communications and cyber-physical systems composed of hardware, firmware, and software. We refer to this new way of thinking and set of principles as Industrial DevOps. Industrial DevOps offers the ability to adapt to changing needs, reduce cycle time for delivery, increase value for money, and leverage innovations. For large cyber-physical solutions, software is only one part of the value stream and if we apply these principles to only one part of the value stream, the rest of the value stream quickly becomes the bottleneck impacting our ability to demonstrate and deliver frequently. When adopting Industrial DevOps principles to developing cyber-physical solutions it is important to understand flow and how we design and build in order to iterate for faster feedback and results.  Using an autonomous vehicle scenario, we will discuss the importance of Industrial DevOps principles, systems thinking and value stream identification for improving dynamic learning. 

Bio:

Chapter Meeting June 14, 2022 

"Feature Space: Where System Value, Purpose, Risk, and Configurability All Come Together" by Dr. William "Bill" Schindel

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: Model-based digital engineering offers the possibility of clarity of models that powered the scientific revolution. Among the surprising results of this is realization that, for sufficiently structured  models, some seemingly separate aspects of engineering can be collapsed into a simpler integrated representation. Engineers are accustomed to thinking of mission engineering, stakeholder needs analysis, requirements engineering, optimization of design, risk analysis, and engineering of product line variants as a series of related but different subjects that  collectively add up to a complex problem. In this talk, we will summarize some implications of the question  “What is the smallest model of a system?”  for purposes of engineering and science across the life cycle. We will  take a look at Feature Space, how it reduces degrees of freedom to give a clearer integrated  view of system value, purpose,  risk, and configurability,  along with SysML  realization of this approach. 

Bio: Dr. William "Bill" Schindel 

Chapter Meeting May 10, 2022 

Planning, Tracking, and Reducing a Complex Project's Value at Risk  by Dr. Tyson Browning

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: Uncertainty and risk make meeting goals and delivering anticipated value extremely challenging in complex system development projects.  Conventional techniques for planning and tracking earned value do not account for uncertainty and risk, nor do they integrate with systems engineering’s technical/quality assessments (such as MoEs, KPIs, or TPMs).  I present a methodology for planning and tracking cost, schedule, and technical performance (or quality) in terms of a project’s key value attributes and threats to them. The methodology distinguishes four types of value and two general types of risks.  A “high jumper” analogy helps to consider how high the “bar” is set for a project (its set goals) and therefore how challenging and risky it will be. A project’s capabilities as a “jumper” (to clear the bar and meet its goals) determine the portion of its value at risk (VaR). By understanding the amounts of value, risk, and opportunity in a project, project managers can design it for appropriate levels of each. Progress is measured in reductions to project VaR:  activities “add value” by chipping away at the project’s “anti-value,” the risks that threaten value. This systems perspective on project management incentivizes the generation of results that eliminate threats to value, rather than assuming that value exists until proven otherwise.

Bio: Dr. Tyson R. Browning is an internationally recognized researcher, educator, and consultant.  He is a full Professor of Operations Management in the Neeley School of Business at Texas Christian University, where he conducts research on managing complex projects (integrating managerial and engineering perspectives) and teaches MBA courses on project management, operations management, risk management, and process improvement.  A sought-after speaker, he has trained and advised several organizations, including BNSF Railway, General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Seagate, Siemens, Southern California Edison, and the U.S. Navy.  He has also served as an expert witness in legal proceedings. 

Chapter Meeting April 12, 2022

Tilting at Windmills: Drivers, Risk, Opportunity, Resilience and the 2021 Texas Electricity Grid Failure  by Mr. Matthew Hause 

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: To put it very simply, but not at all clearly, the 2021 Texas electricity grid failure was both caused by and not caused by the use of renewable energy. In 2020, 46 percent of Texas's energy was generated by natural gas, coal 18 percent, nuclear 11 percent, and renewables wind power 23 percent, and solar 2 percent. During the winter months when power demand is lowest, renewables can rise to up to 55%. When the historic winter storms hit, the biggest problem was the lack of winterization of all types of generation systems and supporting infrastructure. All the of the systems failed to various degrees. So why weren’t these systems winterized? Mostly it was a lack of incentives. The government provided no financial incentives and did not mandate winterization. These winter storms were once in a century event, and companies could not make a business case with reasonable ROI to winterize. Companies that did manage to operate sold power and gas for up to 400% more than normal due to the lack of supply and increased demand. So, there was a built-in disincentive to not invest. What happened was a complex system of systems failure the size and scale of Texas and to explain it all would require a book. This paper will look at the risks, opportunities, and drivers of Texas electric grid, what caused it to fail, and incentives to succeed in the future. We will also examine incentive systems gone wrong such as the Cobra Effect.

Bio: Matthew Hause is a Principal Engineer at SSI, a chair of the UAF group and a member of the OMG SysML specification team. He was a member of the OMG Architecture Board for 10 years. He has been developing multi-national complex systems for over 40 years as a systems and software engineer. He started out working in the power systems industry then transitioned to command and control systems, process control, communications, SCADA, distributed control, Military systems, and many other areas of technical and real-time systems. His role at SSI includes Consulting, mentoring, standards development, presentations at conferences, and developing and presenting training courses.

Chapter Meeting March 8, 2022

"Tensions and Opportunities: Program Management and Systems Engineering"  by Dr. Tina P. Srivastava 

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: The disciplines of Program Management and Systems Engineering are inherently intertwined. To develop and deliver complex systems, all three sides of the “iron triangle” (cost, schedule, and performance) must be known, traded, and evolved in consideration of the others. When there is tension and confusion over the roles of  PMs vs. SEs, programs  suffer  from  deadline  overruns  and  failures.  As co-chair of the PM-SE Integration Working Group, Dr. Srivastava will discuss the recent work of the WG, and specifically the updates for the new INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook v5. There will be a brand new section on PM-SE, and new content added to other sections as well. Furthermore, INCOSE’s discussions with new PMI leadership have been productive and have identified a wide range of collaboration opportunities. Dr. Srivastava will take inputs from the chapter as the two organizations will be working together to develop a long term strategic plan

Bio: Dr. Tina P. Srivastava has served on INCOSE’s Board of Directors and received the INCOSE Inaugural David Wright Leadership Award in 2014 for technical and interpersonal competencies in the practice of system engineering as a means for solving the great challenges of our planet. She is a lecturer at MIT in the areas of aerodynamics, aviation, complex systems, and technology road mapping and selection. She is also the author of Innovating in a Secret World, featured by MIT. Dr. Srivastava co-chairs the PM-SE Integration Working Group and is one of the authors and editors of the book Integrating Program Management and Systems Engineering. As an innovator, entrepreneur, and technology expert, Tina’s experience spans roles as Chief Engineer of electronic warfare programs at Raytheon to cofounder of a venture-backed security startup. She is an FAA-certified pilot and instructor of MIT’s Pilot Ground School course. Dr. Srivastava earned her PhD in Strategy, Innovation, and Engineering, a Masters in System Design and Management, and a Bachelors in Aeronautics and Astronautics, all from MIT.

Chapter Meeting February 8, 2022

Monterey Phoenix (MP) Project by Dr. Kristin Giammarco

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: This brief will be an overview of the Monterey Phoenix (a Navy-developed language, approach, and tool for modeling and reasoning about system and process behaviors), then presenting for the first time, new public example analyses including how one student discovered emergent behavior in a model of a PPE supply chain and how another student conducted a risk analysis of a cyberattack on a pipeline.   We will share some new features of the MP-Firebird and MP-Gryphon tools that enhance ease of use.  Finally, we will present some new MP learning and engagement opportunities.

Bio: Kristin Giammarco is an Associate Professor in the Department of Systems Engineering at the Naval Postgraduate School, where she teaches courses in systems architecture, system integration and model-based engineering, and conducts research in the use and development  of formal methods for systems architecture modeling.  Dr. Giammarco is a member of INCOSE and serves as the Joint Executive Systems Engineering Management (SEM-PD21) Program Academic Associate.  From NPS, Dr. Giammarco has earned a Ph.D. in Software Engineering, an M.S. in Systems Engineering Management, and a Certificate in Advanced Systems Engineering. She holds a B.E. in Electrical Engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology.  She conducts research on system and software behavioral modeling and architectural patterns and works on improving techniques for teaching graduate level courses  in distance learning environment.

Chapter Meeting January 18, 2022

Welcome to the Chapter's New Year. by Mr. Jerome Forbes

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: During our first Chapter meeting of 2022, our new chapter President will introduce the 2022 newly elected chapter board members and discuss the results of the 2021 Chapter members survey. 

Bio:   Jerome Forbes is currently the Advanced Concepts & Technologies (ACT) Product Line System Assurance Lead for Raytheon Intelligence & Space. He has over 16 years of experience spanning requirements, CONOPS and architecture development, testing, troubleshooting, and repairing EOIR and Radar systems, FPGA firmware development, MBSE, production support, OCONUS system deployments, system integrity, and System Assurance.  Jerome has held various other positions at various locations during his career such as Architecture Lead, IPT Lead, Technical Lead, Subsystem Architect, Software Requirements SE Lead, Systems Test Engineer, In-Country Engineering Lead, FPGA Firmware Designer, Production Support Engineer, SE Process Engineer and Project Coordinator. 
Jerome previously served as the INCOSE North Texas chapter President Elect(2021), Vice President of Chapter Development for two terms (2020 and 2021), and Treasurer for two terms (2018 and 2019). He has been the INCOSE site ambassador for the Raytheon McKinney, TX site since 2017, hosting site monthly INCOSE chapter meetings. 
Jerome is a Texas State Licensed Professional Engineer (P.E.), an INCOSE Certified Systems Engineering Professional (CSEP), an OMG-Certified Systems Modeling Professional (OCSMP) - Model User, a Registered Product Owner, a Registered Scrum Master, Raytheon Program Management Level 6 certified,  and The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) 9 certified. 
He earned a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics with a minor in Computer Science from Miles College, a master’s degree in Electrical Engineering from Tuskegee University and a master’s degree in Systems Engineering from Southern Methodist University. He is currently working toward a PhD in Electrical Engineering at Southern Methodist University. 

Chapter Meeting December 14, 2021

The Innovation Ecosystem: Introduction to the INCOSE ASELCM Pattern by Mr. William "Bill" Schindel

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: Gaining the benefits of Digital Engineering is not only about implementing digital technologies. The Innovation Ecosystem is a system of systems in its own right, at least partly engineered, subject to the risks and challenges of evolving socio-technical systems.  

Bio: 

Chapter Meeting November 9, 2021

Stakeholder engagement for Agile at Scale by Mr. Ken Garlington

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: One of the principles behind the Agile Manifesto is that “Business people and developers must work together daily throughout the project.” What does this mean for large, complex systems with many stakeholders? Ken Garlington shares some ideas on the subject.

Bio: Kennie Garlington is a Systems Engineer supporting the Engineering and Technology directorate at Lockheed Martin Aeronautics. In this role, he is responsible for providing systems engineering guidance and technical expertise to all lines of business and programs across the enterprise. Mr. Garlington’s current areas of interest include model-based systems engineering, software safety and reliability, and the application of Agile principles and practices to large-scale mission-critical systems. Mr. Garlington has over 37 years of experience in software engineering and systems engineering for military aircraft programs.

Mr. Garlington’s previous role was the lead systems engineer for various avionics modernization projects for the F-22 Raptor. He has also held systems engineering and software engineering positions on the F-35, F-16 and F-111 platforms.

Mr. Garlington has a Master of Science in Systems Engineering, as well as a Master’s of Software Engineering and a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science. In addition, he is certified as a SAFe® Program Consultant (SPC),  a Program Management Institute Agile Certified Professional (PMI-ACP)®, and an International Council of Systems Engineering (INCOSE) Certified Systems Engineering Professional (CSEP)

Chapter Meeting October 12, 2021

Identifying and removing barriers for Enterprise Solution Delivery by Dr. Suzette Johnson and Ms. Robin Yeman

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: In 2009 Patrick Debois coined the term DevOps at a Velocity event in Belgium. Now, over a decade later there have been countless books to describe this cooperation between development and operations to deliver capability rapidly to the user. We further have extended that term into Industrial DevOps to account for complex system of systems, which include hardware, firmware, and software. Many of the practices such as small batch sizes, limit work in progress, and organizing around value are not new. The benefits of these practices in quality, schedule, cost, transparency, value are undisputed facts that have been shown repeatedly in periodicals such as the DORA report.

The question is if the ideas are not new, and the benefits are proven, why is it so difficult for organizations to embrace Industrial DevOps principles and practices? In the presentation, we will introduce the audience to Industrial DevOps principles and walk through common barriers to adoption. The barriers include areas such as Organizational Structure, Psychological Safety, Access to Common Language, Understanding the Value Stream, Lack of Trust, Access to patterns to break down systems, and exclusive over inclusive behaviors.

Bio: Dr. Suzette Johnson works for Northrop Grumman Corporation near Baltimore, Maryland. As an NG Fellow, she leads Northrop Grumman’s Enterprise Lean-Agile Center of Excellence. Over the past fifteen years, she has been leading the adoption of Business Agility at scale and has supported over 100 NG internal, Federal, and DoD programs in their adoption of Lean-Agile principles and practices.  She received a Doctorate of Management and Technology at the University of Maryland with a dissertation focused on the Impact of leadership styles on software project outcomes in traditional and agile engineering environments.

Robin Yeman is the CTO of Catalyst Campus for Technology & Innovation. Her expertise spans over twenty-five years of experience in systems engineering, software development, and IT with the focus on Agile software development across multiple domains.  She has been actively leading Agile programs execution at scale both domestically and internationally for the last eighteen years. Robin is currently is pursuing a Ph.D. in Systems Engineering at Colorado State University with a dissertation focus on best practices for delivering complex safety critical system of systems utilizing Agile and DevSecOps.

Both Robin Yeman and Suzette Johnson have published multiple papers in Industrial DevSecOps through IT Revolution where they outline how to expand DevSecOps outside of software into management, hardware and firmware. In pursuit of continuous improvement within the defense domain they co-lead NDIA ADAPT (Agile Development for Agencies, Programs and Teams) and support INCOSE Agile Systems Engineering and SEI’s Agile Working Group. They have spoken at over 40 conferences both nationally and abroad.

Chapter Meeting September 14, 2021

Enhancing Municipal Cyber Resiliency through Phishing Risk Monitoring by Ms. Racheal Hill 

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: Municipal government critical public services and private data have been targeted by two-thirds of publicly known, successful phishing attacks costing thousands to millions of dollars with 9.6-day downtimes. From 2017-2020, the estimated reported ransom paid per event in municipalities was $125,697 and the average ransom demand rose from a monthly average of $30,000 to $500,000.  Ransomware, until paid or recovered, can render city’s necessary services and vital information inaccessible or inoperable, including but not limited to public safety, public utilities, and information services.  A phishing risk monitoring tool is required to reduce municipal vulnerability to ransomware attacks, protecting city critical services and private data and avoiding costly downtime, ransoms, and recovery costs. Reducing city vulnerability to phishing emails - one of the most common ransomware infection vectors – helps to defend against attacks that could cost millions and place lives at risk. Due to budget constraints, competing needs and strategic priorities, local municipalities lack the resources and controls needed to stay ahead of adversaries seeking to infiltrate and destroy their networks.  This presentation explores the foundational themes that form the basis of research centered around the development of a Municipal Phishing Defense Tool.

References: 

1. G. R. T. White, R. A. Allen, A. Samuel, A. Abdullah, & R. J. Thomas. (2020). Antecedents of cybersecurity implementation: A study of the cyber-preparedness of U.K. social enterprises. - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1-12. doi:10.1109/TEM.2020.2994981

2. Lasky, S. (2019, Jul). The ransomware scourge: That threaten today's city governments. Security Technology Executive, 29, 50-53. Retrieved from http://proxygw.wrlc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.proxygw.wrlc.org/magazines/ransomware-scourge-that-threaten-todays-city/docview/2272729332/se-2?accountid=11243

3. Virginia IT Agency. (2020). Ransomware Study Report (2020 HJ 64). https://www.vita.virginia.gov/media/vitavirginiagov/resources/pdf/Ransomware-Study-Report.pdf

Bio: Racheal Hill is an experienced engineering professional, space enthusiast and civic leader. Racheal received her Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from Tuskegee University. She earned her Master of Business Administration degree from Texas A&M University – Commerce. She is pursuing a Doctor of Engineering degree in Engineering Management at The George Washington University, School of Engineering and Applied Science. Professionally, Racheal is an Engineering Supervisor with Abbott Laboratories.

Racheal is passionate about educating youth in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). Her passion for STEM outreach and education led her to being selected to serve as a Solar System Ambassador for NASA / Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The Solar System Ambassadors Program is a public outreach program designed to work with motivated volunteers across the nation to communicate the excitement of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) space exploration missions and information about recent discoveries to people in their local communities. Racheal has partnered with the Lancaster Veteran’s Memorial Library and hosted space themed youth educational outreach programs. She has served on numerous panels that focus on women in STEM and has presented at various conferences for the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE). Additionally, she had led efforts to charter several NSBE Jr. Chapters.

Racheal has a long-standing history of service with The City of Lancaster and presently serves on the City Council as Mayor Pro Tempore, District 5. She has served as the Chair of the Planning and Zoning Commission, a member of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Committee, a member of the Cedar Valley College Presidential Search Advisory Committee and graduate of the Civic Leadership Academy. Racheal holds the designation of Certified Municipal Officer (CMO) from the Texas Municipal League (TML).

Racheal serves the great Dallas/Fort Worth community-at-large through her memberships in Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc., Jack and Jill of America, Inc., The Junior League of Dallas, and The Links, Incorporated.

Chapter Meeting August 10, 2021

Challenges of Needs and Requirements Definition and Management for Complex Systems by Lou Wheatcraft 

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: Defining and managing needs and requirements across the system lifecycle is increasingly challenging 
when developing today’s complex, software-centric systems - especially for systems that are being 
contracted out to suppliers. These challenges are a result of increases in: 
– Complexity
– The role software has in the system architecture (software-centric systems are the norm)
– Dependencies and number of interactions between parts of the system
– The interactions between a system and the macro system it is a part
– The number of threats across interface boundaries and vulnerabilities to those threats
– Dependencies between project management and systems engineering 
– Dependencies between systems engineering lifecycle process activities and artifacts
– Oversight 
– Competition 
– The pressure (and need) to reduce development time and time to market
– Risks: program/project, development, manufacturing, system integration, verification, validation, and 
operational
– The number of projects that are over budget and experiencing schedule slippage

During this session, Lou Wheatcraft will address these challenges and propose a methodology that will 
enable organizations to move from the outdated 20th century practice of systems engineering to a 
practice of systems engineering better suited to the development of the increasingly complex, softwarecentric systems typical of the 21st century. Lou will also introduce the audience to three new products 
being developed by the Requirements Working Group, that address the concepts 
proposed in this presentation. 

Bio: Lou Wheatcraft is a senior consultant and managing member of Wheatland Consulting, 
LLC. Lou is an internationally recognized expert in systems engineering with a focus on 
needs, requirements definition and management and verification and validation across 
the system lifecycle. 
Lou has over 50 years’ experience in systems engineering, including 22 years in the United States Air Force. 
Lou has taught over 200 requirement seminars over the last 21 years. Lou supports clients from 
government and industries involved in developing and managing systems and products including 
aerospace, defense, medical devices, consumer goods, transportation, and energy. 
Lou has spoken at Project Management Institute (PMI) chapter meetings and INCOSE conferences and 
chapter meetings. Lou has published and presented many papers concerning needs and requirements 
development and management for NASA’s PM Challenge, INCOSE, INCOSE INSIGHT Magazine, and 
Crosstalk Magazine. Lou is a member of INCOSE, former Chair and current Co-Chair of the INCOSE 
Requirements Working Group. 
Lou has a BS degree in Electrical Engineering from Oklahoma State University; an MA degree in Computer 
Information Systems from the University of Houston – Clear Lake; an MS degree in Environmental 
Management from the University of Houston – Clear Lake; and has completed the course work for an MS 
degree in Studies of the Future from the University of Houston – Clear Lake. 

Chapter Meeting July 13, 2021

Exposing and Controlling Emergent Behaviors with Monterey Phoenix  by Dr. Kristen Giammarco

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: Monterey Phoenix (MP) is a Navy-developed lightweight formal methods behavior modeling approach and tool designed to generate a set of behavior scenarios that is exhaustive up to a user-defined scope limit.  Students and faculty experimenting with MP have discovered unintended, invalid, and potentially high-consequence behaviors latent within their designs fitting qualitative descriptions of weak and strong emergence.  These unwanted behaviors contradicted stakeholder intent, yet were not prohibited by any requirements. After a condensed introduction to MP, we present an approach to emergent behavior detection, prediction, classification, and control using an architecture model of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), an operator, and an environment.  We conclude with a discussion of implications of this approach for a new skill area of emergent behavior analysis of system and SoS models, and information on how to learn the approach and tool for specific applications of interest. 

Bio: Kristin Giammarco is an Associate Professor in the Department of Systems Engineering at the Naval Postgraduate School, where she teaches courses in systems architecture, system integration and model-based engineering, and conducts research in the use and development  of formal methods for systems architecture modeling.  Dr. Giammarco is a member of INCOSE and serves as the Joint Executive Systems Engineering Management (SEM-PD21) Program Academic Associate.  From NPS, Dr. Giammarco has earned a Ph.D in Software Engineering, an M.S. in Systems Engineering Management, and a Certificate in Advanced Systems Engineering. She holds a B.E. in Electrical Engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology.  She conducts research on system and software behavioral modeling and architectural patterns and works on improving techniques for teaching graduate level courses  in distance learning environment. 

Chapter Meeting June 8, 2021

Using Design Structure Matrices (DSMs) for Modeling System Architectures by Dr. Tyson R. Browning

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: The design structure matrix (DSM) is a powerful tool for visualizing, analyzing, innovating, and improving systems—including product designs, organizational structures, and process flows.  The DSM is a square matrix showing relationships among system elements, which can be product components, software code packages, teams, activities, etc.  By analyzing a DSM, one can prescribe a better (e.g., more modular, less cyclical) system architecture or organization.  The DSM is concise, visually appealing, and used in many organizations across diverse industries.  Users have found the DSM extremely useful for fostering architectural innovation.  This presentation introduces product architecture DSM applications for product developers and systems engineers.  Real-life examples are presented from the aerospace, automotive, and other industries.  DSM models work well in conjunction with MBSE and architecture framework tools. 

·       Bio: Dr. Tyson R. Browning is an internationally recognized researcher, educator, and consultant.  He is a full Professor of Operations Management in the Neeley School of Business at Texas Christian University, where he conducts research on managing complex projects (integrating managerial and engineering perspectives) and teaches MBA courses on project management, operations management, risk management, and process improvement.  A sought-after speaker, he has trained and advised several organizations, including BNSF Railway, General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Seagate, Siemens, Southern California Edison, and the U.S. Navy.  He has also served as an expert witness in legal proceedings. 

·       Prior to joining TCU in 2003, he worked for Lockheed Martin, the Lean Aerospace Initiative at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Honeywell Space Systems, and Los Alamos National Laboratory.  He earned a B.S. in Engineering Physics from Abilene Christian University before two Master’s degrees and a Ph.D. from MIT. 

·       His research results appear in journals such as California Management Review, Decision Sciences, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Journal of Mechanical Design, Journal of Operations Management, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, MIT Sloan Management Review, Production & Operations Management, Project Management Journal, and Systems Engineering.  He is also the co-author of a book on the Design Structure Matrix (DSM).  He has given over 200 academic and industry presentations and workshops in 17 countries. 

·       Having previously served as a Department or Associate Editor for three journals, he is currently co-Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Operations Management.  He is a member of several professional societies:  Academy of Management, Association for Supply Chain Management, Decision Sciences Institute, Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, International Council on Systems Engineering, Production and Operations Management Society, and Project Management Institute. 

Chapter Meeting May 11, 2021

Aircraft System Model in SysML Multi-disciplinary Simulation and Analysis for Early Virtual Integration by Dr. Saulius (Saul) Pavalkis  

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: Decreasing time-to-market phases and the increasing complexity of future systems make it difficult for engineers to test the proper performance of the systems, implement changes, and optimize system architecture.  With help of system model in SysML simulation and integration with multidisciplinary engineering tools we can reach high level maturity of MBSE / digital engineering adoption. In this webinar we will present state of the art solution:  
o Cameo Systems Modeler aircraft SysML project simulation.  
o We will connect SysML model with Dassault Systems Process Composer for multidisciplinary simulation orchestration leveraging multiple models and simulations.  
o We will simulate system model in context of aircraft geometry and mission parameters.  
o We will perform requirement verification.  

Bio: Bio: Saulius (Saul) Pavalkis, PhD  
CATIA NO MAGIC - CYBER SYSTEMS Industry Business Senior Consultant and MBSE Transformation Leader   
18 years at Dassault Systems (No Magic) in model-based solutions and R&D currently working as MBSE Transformation Leader. Expert in systems modeling, simulation, MBSE ecosystem, interfaces / integrations, traceability, queries  
INCOSE CSEP, OMG OCSMP, No Magic lifetime modeling and simulation excellence award  
Community author for simulation (youtube.com/c/MBSEExecution) and MBSE success cases (blog.nomagic.com)  
Author of multiple papers on MBSE. In 2020 got NAVAIR $20M budget for V&V paper implementation  
Representative at INCOSE CAB. Supporting MBSE adoption in A&D, T&M and other domains. Major clients: P&W , Boeing, NASA, BAE Systems, Raytheon Technologies, NGC, FORD  
  

Chapter Meeting April 13, 2021

Digital Engineering (DE): The Next Chapter of MBSE by Paul White

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: What is digital engineering (DE)? How does DE relate to MBSE? In this presentation, we will show how DE is the next chapter of MBSE. We will talk about the Office of the Secretary Defense’s (OSD) Digital Engineering Strategy, released in June 2018. We will discuss the goals of the DES and how you can implement DE in your current and future systems engineering efforts. This presentation is for those who would like an introduction to DE. 

Bio: Paul White is the ICBM GBSD Digital Engineering Branch Lead for BAE Systems at Hill Air Force Base, Utah. He has worked previously at Kihomac, Astronautics Corporation of America, L-3 Harris, and Raytheon. He has 20 years of experience in the aerospace industry. 

Chapter Meeting March 9, 2021

Using Architecture and MBSE to Develop Validated Requirements by Dr. Ronald "Ron" Carson

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: Requirements incompleteness and ambiguity continue to plaque many organizations.  The introduction of MBSE provides an opportunity to relate the structure of the architecture model to the structure of requirements, and synchronize the data between them. 

• In this presentation we demonstrate how to use model-based systems engineering and the related architecture to develop and validate requirements of all types. We first describe the structure of different types of requirements and map the requirements elements, e.g., function, to elements of the architecture in the MBSE model. We show how these requirements elements map to specific data elements in a particular MBSE tool for all possible types of requirements. Finally, we show how this method enables validation of the requirements from the architecture. 

• Attendees will gain an understanding of how to integrate their organizational requirements development and MBSE architecture activities by mapping the data elements between them and integrating these into their MBSE tools.   

 

Bio: Dr. Ron Carson is an Adjunct Professor of Engineering at Seattle Pacific University, an Affiliate Assistant Professor in Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Washington, a Fellow of the International Council on Systems Engineering and a certified Expert Systems Engineering Professional. 
He retired in 2015 as a Technical Fellow in Systems Engineering after 27 years at The Boeing Company. He is the author of numerous articles regarding requirements analysis and systems engineering measurement. He has been issued six US patents in satellite communications, and two patents regarding “Structured Requirements Generation and Assessment”.

INCOSE IW 2021 Presentation

INCOSE NTX Collaboration with Office 365 by Sarena Gazic and Yvonne Bijan

Abstract: This is a recording of the presentation we did at the INCOSE IW.

Chapter Meeting November 10

A Perspective on Understanding Requirements Development by Mr. Ricarte A. Bernal (Rick), Director Systems Engineering, ADD, Irving, TX

Location: Virtual (see chapter newsletter for connection information)

Abstract: “Systems engineering is an interdisciplinary approach and means to enable the realization of successful systems” as defined in the INCOSE Systems Engineering handbook. Specifically, requirements development is the fundamental activity in defining a successful system of interest. It is critical enterprise wide information that directly affect the cost, schedule, and quality of all products produced and delivered to customers. As critical as this function is, there are differences in practice from industry to industry. This presentation provides a perspective of the differences and challenges with requirements development faced by the Aerospace/Defense and In-Vitro Diagnostics Device industries.

Bio: Sr. Manager, Network & Tactical Systems, Boeing Defense, Space & Security; Sr. Systems Technical Lead Engineer, Phantom Works Resilient Technologies, Boeing Defense, Space & Security
• Successfully led and managed multiple engineering teams to develop product lines across multiple geographic locations and technical baselines.
• Simultaneously led and proposed multiple new engineering development programs each ranging from $5M to $150M concurrently.
• Recognized in requirements development starting with CONOPS, developing the architecture, and effectively developing the requirements specifications, the lower level design, and the SW and HW through integration using Agile SE.
• Strong reputation for unquestioned integrity, work ethic, engineering skills, and leadership; working with all teams effectively, maintaining honest and open relationships to determine the best quality solutions and products.
• BS, U.S. Naval Academy (Go Navy!)
• MS SAE, University of Southern California (Fight On!)
• Retired Navy Commander, U.S. Naval Reserve – Awarded Distinguished Service Medal.
 

Chapter Meeting October 13

Future Directions for MBSE and SysML by Chris Schreiber


Bio: Chris Schreiber is a Systems Engineering Senior Manager for Lockheed Martin Space with responsibility for the Systems Engineering Modernization department, focused on supporting Space Systems programs with Model-Based Systems Engineering, Agile Systems Engineering, and Augmented Reality capabilities. For 10+ years Chris has been focused on developing and deploying MBSE practices, training and infrastructure at Space Systems. He has led a number of Model-Based Engineering and Systems Engineering pilots, IRADs and implementations, including Systems Engineering efforts for Lockheed Martin’s Digital Transformation Initiative. Chris has 20+ years of experience in a variety of industries ranging from Management Consulting to Manufacturing to Aerospace. Chris is active in a number of industry associations as a member of INCOSE and OMG, co-chairing the Model & Simulation Committee for the National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Systems Engineering Division, the joint OSD/INCOSE/NDIA Digital Engineering Information Exchange Working Group (DEIXWG), and works on development efforts for SysML 2.0. He also serves as a Corporate Advisory Board member for Englewood Public Schools’ STEM initiative.
 

Chapter Meeting September 8

Title: Engineering Large Organizations for Agility by Ken Garlington

Chapter Meeting August 11

SAFe with MBSE for System Engineers by Peter Luckey

Abstract: It is only within the last five years that the Scaled Agile Framework has accommodated Systems Engineering. A focus of the accommodation is on incorporating Model Based System Engineering (MBSE) into the Framework.

Here we introduce a particular way to use MBSE in the context of the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe). We want to iteratively build a model of the system in order to compose the Requirements Specification and identify the Features to be built in successive Program Increments (PIs). That is, it in a nutshell. The model is built in a set of workshops prior to and during each PI.

Workshops are face-to-face meetings, for primarily the Architects and Systems Engineers, that create a shared understanding across customers, users, domain experts, product owners and teams. Along with the System Engineers, these other groups will have representation in the workshops. They record system structure, behavior, and information decisions in SysML using a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) approach. The workshops align everyone on a common approach to building a solution while discovering and driving work in the agile backlog.

Bio: Peter Luckey, a Senior Solutions Consultant at 321 Gang, is a Certified Scrum Master and a Certified SAFe Program Consultant (4.5). He received his master's degree in computer science from Purdue University. Peter began his professional career in IBM's Federal Systems Division as a programmer and then became the manager of IBM's Rational Software Development Environment. Concurrently, Peter worked as an Adjunct Associate Professor at the State University of New York Binghamton teaching software engineering and publishing a number of papers on the subject. Since joining Rational, Peter has been involved in selling and supporting Rational, now IBM, tools and the processes supported by these tools. These processes include topics such as Agile, MBSE, and SAFe. Recently, Peter has also become Certified relative to Polarion/ALM.
 

Chapter Meeting July 14

Innovate or Die: The Imperative for Change - Tech Presentation by Jon Clauss

Abstract: The need for change and innovation are often talked about like they are ‘a good idea’, or somehow optional. History shows that companies that fail to innovate or evolve with the changing times will soon cease to exist or exist in the same form. This presentation will explore the history of Lockheed Martin and other cases, to show this and serve as a ‘call to action’ to transform how we do business and drive us to innovate.

Bio: Jon Clauss is a Purdue Graduate (‘85 A&AE), Lockheed Martin Fellow and has been at Lockheed Martin Aeronautics – Fort Worth and legacy companies for 30+ years. He started his career in the Flight Controls area and has worked the integration of system including the F-111, F-16, X-35 and F-35. He was won 3 AeroStar awards (2 team, 1 individual). His current work focus is architecture, systems engineering and integration of the F-35 with off-board systems and the F-35 Enterprise. He has presented papers/presentations on topics as diverse as; the value of Hardware in The Loop Simulation, F-35 Model Based System Engineering Lessons Learned, and System Architecture Lessons Learned from On-Line Gaming, and Millers’ Law. He is a Senior Member of AIAA, a member of the International Council of System Engineering (INCOSE) and a member of the Association of Airworthiness Professionals (AAP).
 

Chapter Meeting June 9

Early System V&V Using SysML Simulation by Saulius (Saul) Pavalkis, Phd

Abstract: Webinar demonstrates recent trends in system model execution with SysML to perform early validation and latter architecture and design verification. We will demonstrate system simulation, automated requirements verification, test cases specification and automated execution. We will use Cameo Simulation Toolkit which is integrating pluggable evaluation engines and standards to enable out of the box system model execution and analysis.

NASA perspective on recent trends in executable models: “This is an important development since it requires minimal configuration, can be used earlier in the lifecycle and can evolve as the design matures.”

Full hands-on one day tutorial on system simulation will be provided at MBSE Cyber Experience Symposium at Allen Texas. Reserve your spot at https://mbsecyberexperience2020.com/.

Bio: Saulius (Saul) Pavalkis, Phd - Chief MBSE Solutions Architect at 3DS CATIA | No Magic Cyber Systems Center of Excellence

17 years of experience working on modeling solutions. Working as a chief MBSE solutions architect, consultant, and trainer. Former analyst and PLM products integration manager in R&D department core MagicDraw team with 10 years of experience. Major expertise areas are MBSE, system simulation, SysML. Successfully helping major companies to adopt MBSE.

Major practical expertise areas are MBSE, system simulation, requirements, data interchange, SysML, UML, traceability, modeling solutions, change and configuration management. Helping major companies adopting MBSE: Ford, Boeing, NASA, NGC, Draper, Raytheon, UTAS, BAH, MITRE, L3Harris. Multiple research and practical articles in model-based architecture and analysis at INCOSE, NDIA, etc. Founder of "MBSE Execution" Youtube channel on model simulation and chief editor of a modeling community blog (blog.nomagic.com) dedicated to sharing practical model-based engineering experience. Representative at INCOSE CAB. In 2018 received lifetime achievement in MBSE and Modeling award from No Magic, Inc. “Cameo Award for Modeling, Simulation & Analysis Excellence.”
BS Electronics and telecommunication (Kaunas University of Technology)
MS Telecommunication engineering (Kaunas University of Technology)
PhD Computer Science (Kaunas University of Technology)
OCSMP - OMG-Certified SysML Modeling Professional
OCUP - OMG-Certified UML Professional
ASEP - Associated SE profesional (CSEP is pending).
 

Chapter Meeting May  12

The Digital Thread, Advanced Manufacturing, and Industry 4.0 by Dr. Don Kinard

Abstract: Over the past decade or so the digital thread has provided great opportunities to improve engineering and manufacturing products and has allowed unprecedented levels of automation in the aerospace industry. More recently the maturation of the digital thread has provided opportunities to integrate our large IT systems to initiate the start of Industry 4.0, the next industrial revolution, the revolution of data.

Bio: Dr. Don Kinard is a Senior Fellow for Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Production Operations and has been with LM for 35 years. Currently Don supports Digital Transformation at Aeronautics as well as programs such as F-35. Prior to his current assignment he was lead for the F-35 Fighter Production System (rate transition) development for F-35 and earlier the Director of F-35 Production Engineering responsible for Joint Strike Fighter Tooling, Planning, Manufacturing Engineering, and Aircraft Systems Testing. Before joining F-35 in 2004 Dr. Kinard held various positions in both Engineering and Manufacturing during his 18 years on the F-22.

Don is also the lead for the LM Corporate Fellow’s Manufacturing Team whose objective is to develop and share engineering, manufacturing, and sustainment technologies throughout all of the LM business units. His technical interests include materials and structures, digital thread integration, Industry 4.0, manufacturing technology, manufacturing system design, and production management. In 2018 Dr. Kinard was named as one of the Smart Industries 50 leaders in digital transformation honoring individuals across industry who are making a difference in their organizations’ pursuit and embrace of digital transformation.

Dr. Kinard earned a bachelor’s degree from Trinity University in San Antonio, TX and a PhD (Physical Chemistry- Polymers/Composites focused) from Texas A&M University.
 

Chapter Meeting April 14

Systems Engineering Transformation Surrogate Pilot Experiments: Doing Everything in Models to Demonstrate the Art-of-the-Possible by Dr. Mark Blackburn

Abstract: This  presentation  provides  an  overview  of  the  NAVAIR  Systems  Engineering Transformation  (SET)  Surrogate  Pilot  Experiments  and  discusses  how  these  experiments provide  implementation  examples  that  align  with  the  goals  of  the  DoD  Digital  Engineering Strategy.  It  provides  an  overview  to  set  the  context  of  the  SET  Framework  concept  and Functional  Areas.  The  experiments  are  demonstrating  the  “Art-of-the-Possible”  by  doing “Everything in Models,” to show we can, while operating in a collaborative environment using an
Authoritative Source of Truth (AST).
 
The  briefing  describes  the  approach,  digital  engineering  environments, operational  scenarios, and  results,  such  as:  1)  methods  for  linking  Mission,  System,  and  Contractor  models  to demonstrate  the  concept  of  an  AST,  2)  an  approach  to  transform  the  use  of  Contract  Data Requirement List (CDRLs) using Digital Signoffs directly in the models; the Digital Signoffs link to needed evidence, and 3) explaining the use of Views and Viewpoints for DocGen to generate interactive  web-based  views  of  the  mission  and  system  models  that  are relevant  to  different stakeholders.
 
The  briefing  will  also  show  the  models  that  are  on  line  and  provide information  on  the  All Partners  Network  (APAN.org)  where  additional  details  about approach,  models, presentations and results can be accessed.

Bio: Mark  R.  Blackburn,  Ph.D.  is  a  Senior  Research  Scientist  with  Stevens Institute of Technology and principal at KnowledgeBytes. Dr. Blackburn’s is the  Principal  Investigator  (PI)  on  several  System  Engineering  Research Center  (SERC)  research  tasks  for  both  US  Navy  NAVAIR  and  US  Army ARDEC  on  Systems  Engineering  Transformation  through  Model-Centric Engineering. He has also been PI on a FAA NextGen and National Institute of  Standards  and  Technology  projects  and  has  received  research  funding from the National Science Foundation. He develops and teaches a course on Systems  Engineering  for  Cyber Physical Systems. He  is a  member  of  the SERC Research Council, OpenMBEE Leadership Team and core member of the Semantic Technologies for Systems Engineering initiative.  
Prior to joining Stevens, Dr. Blackburn worked in industry for more than 25 years. He has been the Principal Investigator to the National Institute of Standards and Technology on  projects  dating  back  to  2000  involving  model-based  tools  and  methods  for  verification  and validation  of  security-related products  and  applications.  Dr.  Blackburn holds a  Ph.D. from  George Mason University, a M.S. in Mathematics (emphasis in C.S.) from Florida Atlantic University, and a B.S. in Mathematics (C.S. option) from Arizona State University.  

Chapter Meeting March 10

Regional Conferences at North Texas by Paul White, CSEP, OCSMP

Abstract: Would your chapter like to host a regional conference?
A regional conference will provide many benefits for your chapter and region. In this presentation, we will present the fundamental principles for hosting a successful regional conference such as:
• How do you effectively lead a conference planning committee?
• What logistical issues must you consider?
• How do you create a captivating technical program?
• What can you do to promote your conference?
• How can you manage your budget and increase the likelihood of making a profit?
• Where do you find sponsors for your conference?
We will discuss lessons learned from the Great Lakes Regional Conference (GLRC) and the Western States Regional Conference (WSRC). You will develop greater confidence in your chapter’s ability to support and host a regional conference.

Bio: Paul White is a Senior Systems Engineer at Kihomac in Layton. He works with BAE as an Assistant Project Technical Manager on the ICBM Minuteman III and GBSD platforms. He has nineteen years of experience in the aerospace industry.
Paul has been an INCOSE member since 2007 serving in various top leadership roles in the North Texas (Dallas - Fort Worth) Chapter, Chicagoland Chapter, and Wasatch (Utah) Chapter. He is the current president of the Wasatch Chapter. Paul has been a leader in the annual Great Lakes Regional Conference (GLRC) since 2012 including conference chair for the 6th and 8th conferences. He served as the conference chair for the first annual Western States Regional Conference (WSRC) in Ogden in 2018; and he chairs the WSRC Steering Committee since 2019. He was awarded the INCOSE Outstanding Service Award in 2019. He serves as the Deputy Assistant Director of Technical Events in INCOSE's Technical Operations organization.
He has a graduate certificate in Systems Engineering and Architecting from the Stevens Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree in Computer Science from Texas A&M University-Commerce, and a Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Science from Texas A&M University. He is a Certified Systems Engineering Professional (CSEP) through INCOSE and has an Object Management Group (OMG) Certified Systems Modeling Professional (OCSMP): Model Builder – Fundamental certification.  

Chapter Meeting February 11

National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Overview by Mike Dietz

Abstract: Mike will be giving an overview of the National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA), focusing primarily on activities in North Texas and Austin. NDIA drives strategic dialogue in national security by identifying key issues and leveraging the knowledge and experience of its military, government, industry, and academic members to address them.
NDIA, comprised of its Affiliates, Chapters, Divisions, and 1,700 corporate and 70,000 individual members, is a non-partisan, non-profit, educational association that has been designated by the IRS as a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization - not a lobby firm - and was founded to educate its constituencies on all aspects of national security.

Bio: Mike is the President of the local chapter of the National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) known as “NDIA Lone Star” where he has built and led a chapter of around 2000 members to accomplish major events and activities in North Texas. Under Mike, the chapter has received Model Chapter 5 years in a row and Chapter of Excellence.
In industry, Mike has over 20 years in technology and leadership in the defense industry, including Raytheon and Lockheed Martin. He’s worked on products for Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines as well as Special Operations Command. He has worked in all phases of the product lifecycle from early development through production and sustainment. He’s worked on a wide array of military subsystems, obtaining exposure to numerous technical specialties on every level of integration from the chip level all the way up to force-on-force mission modeling of systems effectiveness.
Mike is the 2010 past president of INCOSE North Texas Chapter (incose.org), where he led the team to receive the Gold Circle Award. Mike has two Masters’, one in Information Engineering and Management and the other in Systems Engineering. Both degrees are from SMU where he has also served on SMU’s System Engineering Development Team. His undergraduate degrees include a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Kentucky, and a B.S. in Math and Physics from Northern Kentucky University.
  

Chapter Meeting - December 10

Hardware-Inclusive DevOps: Applying DevOps Principles and Practices to Cyber-Physical System Engineering

Presenter: Marguerite Bryan

Abstract: DevOps has become the rallying cry of organizations looking to improve time-to-market, quality and other strategic business outcomes. However, much like the Agile Manifesto itself, DevOps surfaced and was developed with a strong software-centric focus. Our more recent frontier is the scaling of DevOps practices to the engineering of large, complex cyber-physical systems composed of hardware, firmware, and software.
In this Hardware-Inclusive DevOps presentation, we will examine the core tenets of DevOps and how they can be applied in organizations building cyber-physical systems. While many of the DevOps principles and practices can be leveraged and applied with minimal adaptation for hardware-inclusive solutions, there are emerging technologies which complement core DevOps practices to specifically address the challenges of applying these principles in the development of cyber-physical systems. Participants will leave with a better understanding of how DevOps practices can be extended to hardware-inclusive systems, and with an action plan for applying these learnings in their organization.

Bio: Marguerite has been mixing things up in the tech industry for over 20 years, starting as a Computer Scientist then building her mastery and expert-level credentials leading organizations through successful DevOps and Agile transformation. Marguerite compliments her technical savvy, business acumen and laser-sharp customer focus with expert leverage of Agile, Lean, Systems Design, and MBSE practices, reaching across and beyond individual disciplines to ignite cultures of innovation and relentless improvement.
Marguerite’s experience in traditional governance, PMO and engineering functions provides important insight for her work in waterfall, hybrid and transitional environments, where she tailors Agile and DevOps transformation roadmaps to the organization’s culture, readiness and goals. She is a regular contributor to DevOpsDays conferences, and her accomplishments have earned her advanced professional certifications and distinction from Scrum Alliance, ICAgile and Scaled Agile, where she engages regularly as a contributor.

321 Gang, Inc.
For over 15 years 321 Gang has built its expertise in the domain of systems and software engineering across the most highly complex and regulated industries in the world, including:

• Aerospace & Defence
• Automotive
• Medical Device
• Electronics
• Communications systems (satellites, etc.)
• Energy
• Government

Chapter Meeting - November 12

Getting Lean with Cupcakes:

Presenter: Ken Garlington

Abstract: Can decorating cupcakes give us insights into better ways to plan and execute development work? In this video, we look at an approach to work that can deliver results faster, reduce rework, and streamline the development infrastructure.

Ken created, directed, and produced a video for his presentation. Here is the link:  

https://youtu.be/M1bOooWtv2Q

If you’d like to try batch experiments, here’s a demonstration of the coin game: https://vimeo.com/274675964

Bio: Ken Garlington has helped build defense aerospace systems as a software engineer and systems engineer at Lockheed Martin for over 35 years. His interests include the application of Lean-Agile principles to systems engineering, safety-critical systems development, and raising two teenagers with his wife, Jacqueline. He is an INCOSE Certified Systems Engineering Professional and a Scaled Agile Program Consultant. He also holds a bachelor’s degree in computer science from Texas A&M and master’s degrees in software engineering & systems engineering from the University of Texas at Arlington.

Success is Assured

Penny Cloft, Michael Kennedy, and Brian Kennedy

Success is Assured by Penny Cloft, Michael Kennedy, and Brian Kennedy provides an approach to solving problems many companies face to help them satisfy their customers.

A key point made throughout the book is that Equally Informed people seldom disagree.

Often when there is a problem, more people are added to the project. Cadence, Pull, and Flow can help improve processes. Try playing the bead game to get people on board with the need to change and to consider an option besides adding more people.

Many bugs are introduced by key decisions made early in the process and decisions making should be delayed until the knowledge has been attained. Breaking the process up into important decision points helped align groups across organizations so people had the data at the same time. Data needed to make the decision needs to be visible to everyone. The book has a number of case studies demonstrating how making decisions without the data had negative impacts on the program. The authors include techniques to solve problems like using causal mapping to define the problem that needs to be solved along with the customer interests that need to be met and determine the information needed to solve the problem.

An alternative to guessing which parameter will impact the solution and running a couple of solutions, is using Set Based Concurrent Engineering to vary all the parameters that affect the solution and compare the results to the customer requirements. Tradeoffs isn’t about the relative priority of requirements/criteria, its about the shapes of the tradeoff curves. E.g. how much of x do I give up to get more y? Traditional prioritization of requirements doesn’t take this into account. Don’t ask your customers if weight is more important than costs because they will say both are important. Ask them if they prefer x weight for y cost instead of c weight for d cost.

Thinking of issues as risks as leads people to treat them statistically instead of focusing on them as a knowledge gap. Identify the knowledge gap at the root cause of the risk and work on closing that gap to close the risk permanently. You don’t need to know everything if you can figure out the worst case and plan for it.

The book walks through taking a bad problem statement to a good one and goes through finding the root cause and evaluating alternative solutions. I found The Problem K-Brief on page 128 is an excellent tool to help define and solve a problem.

There are numerous case studies to help make the authors’ points in a clear and understandable way. For example, there is one about how Toyota doesn’t nail down requirements early but sets rough targets and allows the specifications to emerge with the learning. A key point to learn is that when hard requirements are necessary and people don’t know what values are feasible, then closing the knowledge gap should be a high priority.

The second half of the book starts with making the transition. If you are in one of the companies who spend 65%-75% of their engineering capacity on problem-solving or companies having trouble starting new projects because your people are all still fighting fires on the old projects, consider focusing the transition on first improving problem solving can be effective for establishing a successful engineering environment.

There are many obstacles to the transition like artificial schedule pressures, negotiated schedule and budget pressures, micro management, lack of chart numbers for learning, wishful thinking, specification based practices, pressure to commit early, successful gambler syndrome, not invented here syndrome, lack of organizational focus, and  lack of trusted metrics and cost avoidance not being considered cost savings. The authors address ways of coping with each of these. They then follow a company on a day to day basis providing a clear example for others to follow. 

Everyone should consider Set-Based concurrent engineering practices to determine if it is applicable to helping them solve the problems many of us are facing.

See the video trailer at SuccessIsAssured.com.

Chapter Meeting - October 8

Welcome to SysML, the Language for MBSE!

Presenter: Paul White

Abstract: Would you like to learn about the Systems Modeling Language (SysML)? Each year, more systems engineers are advancing their careers by learning about SysML, Model-based Systems Engineering (MBSE), and modeling tools. In this presentation, we will provide an introduction to SysML, present some modeling tools and techniques, and discuss how you can use SysML to benefit your company and advance your career.
We will begin by introducing SysML. SysML—as a general-purpose modeling language—supports the specification, analysis, design, verification, and validation of a broad range of systems. SysML provides the ability to model requirements, system behavior, and physical architecture. SysML conveys information clearly and concisely as diagrams, tables, and matrices. Moreover, SysML is a comparatively small language that is easy to learn and apply.
After introducing SysML, we will present some modeling tools and techniques. More systems engineering projects are using SysML as part of their MBSE implementations. We will discuss how projects are successfully implementing SysML and MBSE and learning lessons along the way. These principles will apply to legacy systems and newer platforms alike.
Following the tools and techniques, we will suggest some references, training resources, and certifications that can enhance and demonstrate your mastery of SysML. In particular, we will discuss the Object Management Group (OMG) and its SysML certifications.
Those who attend will gain a familiarity with SysML and an appreciation for the benefits of SysML and MBSE.

Bio: Paul is a Senior Systems Engineer at KIHOMAC in Layton. He works with BAE as an Assistant Project Technical Manager on the ICBM Minuteman III platform. Previously, he worked on the Airbus A400M and Boeing EDCU programs for Astronautics Corporation of America in Milwaukee; on both the Big Safari and IBS programs for L-3 Harris in Greenville, Texas; and in factory automation for Hyundai in Eugene, Oregon.
He has nineteen years of experience in the aerospace industry. Paul has been an INCOSE member since 2007 serving in various top leadership roles in the North Texas (Dallas - Fort Worth) Chapter, Chicagoland Chapter, and Wasatch (Utah) Chapter. He is the current president of the Wasatch Chapter. Paul has been a leader in the annual Great Lakes Regional Conference (GLRC) since 2012 including conference chair for the 6th and 8th conferences. He served the conference chair for the first annual Western States Regional Conference (WSRC) in Ogden and is the chair of the WSRC Steering Committee.
He recently was awarded the Outstanding Service Award at the 29th Annual INCOSE International Symposium. The Wasatch chapter was awarded the Most Improved Chapter and Gold Circle awards.
In August 2019, he attended the 68th United Nations (UN) Civil Society Conference in Salt Lake City. He helped with presenting an INCOSE workshop, represented INCOSE at its booth, and coordinated an INCOSE social. This was the first time that INCOSE and systems engineering had been presented before the UN—a worldwide audience.
He serves as Vice Chair of the Utah Engineers Council (UEC), an umbrella organization for fifteen local chapters and societies within the many engineering disciplines. He has been awarded the INCOSE Engineer of the Year award in 2019 and 2018 by the Utah Engineers Council (UEC).
He has a graduate certificate in Systems Engineering and Architecting from the Stevens Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree in Computer Science from Texas A&M University-Commerce, and a Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Science from Texas A&M University. He is a Certified Systems Engineering Professional (CSEP) through INCOSE. In 2019, he obtained an Object Management Group (OMG)-Certified Systems Modeling Professional (OCSMP) Model Builder—Fundamental certification.

Chapter Meeting - September 10

Exposing and Controlling Emergent Behaviors in a System of Systems (SoS) Model

Presenter: Dr. Kristin Giammarco

Abstract: This presentation shows how to segment and extend a SysML activity model for emergent behavior analysis using Monterey Phoenix (MP). MP generates sets of behavior scenarios that are exhaustive up to a user-defined scope (number of iterations). After summarizing relevant definitions, we present, discuss and analyze examples of emergent behaviors found in the extended model, some of which contradict stakeholder intent and inspire consideration of SoS-wide consequences if they were to occur in reality. We also show how emergent behaviors may be classified as weak, strong, positive or negative. We conclude with some key takeaways and lessons learned for repeating these types of discoveries in other SoS models.

Bio: Dr. Kristin Giammarco is an Associate Professor in the Department of Systems Engineering at the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS), where she teaches courses in system architecture and design, system integration, systems software engineering, and model-based systems engineering. She conducts research in the use and development of formal methods for systems architecture modeling as well as system and software behavioral modeling and architectural patterns with students and colleagues within and outside of NPS.  Dr. Giammarco is a member of INCOSE, the Lifecycle Modeling Language Steering Committee, and the International Society for Systems Pathology.  She holds a Ph.D. in Software Engineering, an M.S. in Systems Engineering Management, and a Certificate in Advanced Systems Engineering from NPS and a B.E. in Electrical Engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology. 

Chapter Meeting - August 13

Application of MBSE in AGILE Development

Presenter: Jason Forth, NAVAIR

Abstract: NAVAIR’s latest program goal is to deploy, integrate, and sustain significant interoperable technology upgrades to increase the mission profile of the aircraft system in the coming years. The Northrop Grumman MBSE Agile Team has been establishing a system model for the as is product baseline, to be designed baseline, and the processes for each technical discipline with modeling approaches to transition into a digital technical baseline for the program. In the last two releases, the team has been developing modeling approach activity diagrams and style guide diagrams within the architecture modeling application, CAMEO Enterprise Architect®, to meet the Systems Engineering Modeling and Architecture Plan (SEMAP). The approach diagram provides each sprint team the “tasks, work products, and flow” to complete each type of modeling domain (e.g. behavioral) while the style guide diagrams are unique example diagrams with aligning requirements for each definition and usage of objects compliant with UAF and best practices from industry following Object-Oriented System Engineering Methodology (OOSEM). The team is also extending current NAVAIR profiles like classification of each element and view while developing new profiles for data rights and approval. Other MBSE efforts in the corporate portfolio will be able to leverage these style guides, approach diagrams, and profiles to establish system modeling methods for applying system engineering models to streamline digital technical reviews, submit digital deliverables, and increase technical competencies integration into generating their modeling approaches within the broader system model.

Bio: Jason Forth is a Senior Systems Engineering Architect for the Naval Air Warfare Center – Aircraft Division (NAWCAD, or simply NAVAIR) stationed in Patuxent River, MD. He holds a BS in Aerospace Engineering from Syracuse University, and a Masters of Engineering in Systems Engineering from the Stevens Institute of Technology, with graduate certificates in System of Systems and System Architecture. Jason has extensive experience on both the OEM contractor and government sides of acquisition, with particular experience in Cybersecurity, as well as System and SW Safety, that he brings to his role as a Systems Engineering Architect. He is currently assigned to the System Engineering Transformation (SET) initiative at NAVAIR, serving as a lead SE Architect for various pilot program efforts the command has identified.

Chapter Meeting - July 9

System Model Simulation - Monte Carlo, Probabilities, and more…

Presenter: Dr. Saulius Pavalkis

Abstract: Rapidly increasing scale, dynamism, and vulnerabilities in the systems being engineered have presented ever-greater challenges. In part of these challenges Systems Engineers started to explore new ways of working and one of the possible solutions is to use models as a basis for the engineered systems description.
Nowadays Systems Engineers can leverage several modeling languages and tools to their advantage to build system models. However no matter how you are going to look into a model, it still remains a static description of systems being engineered. To access the full power of modeling, Systems Engineers need to transform the static system descriptions into what we could call live or dynamic model.
During this webinar we are going to build live model or in other words – an executable model. The main part will be to explore ways of building executable model and in addition to that delve into a bit more sophisticated simulation capabilities available with UML, SysML, UAF languages and Catia | No Magic tools. The features which will be covered during this webinar: Monte-Carlo simulation, different distributions, result capturing..

Bio: Saulius Pavalkis is the Chief MBSE Solutions Architect at Dassault Systems (Former No Magic, Inc.). Saulius has 15 years of experience working on modeling solutions working as a consultant, trainer, PLM products integration manager, a former analyst in the R&D department core MagicDraw team. Saulius is helping with successful MBSE adoption at major companies: Ford, Boeing, NASA, Orbital ATK (NGC), Draper. Saulius has Ph.D. in Software Engineering – models traceability, BS, and MS in Telecommunication and Electronics Engineering. Last few years represents No Magic, Inc. at INCOSE CAB. In 2018 Saulius received lifetime achievement award from No Magic, Inc. “Cameo Award for Modeling, Simulation & Analysis Excellence.” Founder and chief editor of a modeling community blog (blog.nomagic.com) dedicated to sharing practical model-based engineering experience. Contributor to systems engineering conferences: INCOSE IS, NDIA, GLRC, NMWS.

Chapter Meeting - June 11

Connecting System Architecture to Model-Based Design

Presenter: Lyle Shipton

Abstract: System engineering is a challenging problem. In this talk, we present a workflow for system and software architectural modeling and analysis with a tight connection to Model-Based Design.
Agenda:
-Building a bridge between early architecture work and downstream design
-Creating architecture models and extending the language through stereotypes and profiles
-Analyzing architectures
-Moving to design and implementation  
Bio: Lyle received his B.S. and M.S. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Upon completion of his thesis, Lyle joined Space Exploration Technologies, where he served as the lead engineer for Falcon 9 structural testing and stage integration. After leaving SpaceX, Lyle joined Eaton Aerospace's Fuel and Motion Control Division as lead systems design engineer for system controllers. He joined MathWorks in July 2016. His focus is on Model-Based Design for high-integrity system development.